|

Fertilizers
Long Term Fertilizer Policy
At the initiative of the minister, a new long term fertilizer policy
has been drafted which, while looking after the interests of the
farmers, aims to remove all the aberrations which have come in the
RPS Scheme. While this scheme played a very notable role in increasing
production and consumption of fertilizers in the country, several
aberrations have crept into it over a period of time. It has resulted
in a lack of competitive environment and is also out of tune with
the current philosophy of economic liberalization.
The draft long term Fertilizer Policy has been placed on the internet
and all stockholders like industries, farmers associations, other
Central Government Departments, State Government Departments., State
Government Departments, NGOs etc. are being consulted through road
shows. The new fertilizer sector in a phased manner. The draft long
term fertilizer sector in a phased manner. The draft long term fertilizer
Policy has the following salient features:
 |
Removal of aberrations and deficiencies in the existing pricing
policy of urea.
|
 |
Increase in price of urea at regular intervals.
|
 |
Improvement in the implementation of the concession scheme.
|
 |
Feedstock Policy-Switch over to LNG and feasibility of coal-based
technology.
|
 |
Joint venture policy;
|
 |
New Pricing policy for urea Units.
|
 |
Policy towards creation of new capacity;
|
 |
WTO Related Matters.
|
 |
Removal of distribution controls on Urea.
|
 |
New Role of the Regulator.
|
Correction in Retention Price-cum-Subsidy Scheme
The Retention Price-cum-Subsidy Scheme (RPS) has been the mainstay
of growth of the fertilizer sector from 1977 onwards when it was
first notified following the recommendations of the Marathe Committee
and this has contributed to a sharp growth in the production of
nitrogenous fertilizer in the country. From 12.83 million MTs of
urea production in 1991-92, the actual production went up to 19.87
million MTs in 1999-2000. It is significant to note that the production
level of 19.87 million tonnes though in itself a creditable achievement
was achieved with a declared installed capacity of 18.66 million
MTs. There was palpably understatement of this capacity by some
of the urea manufacturing units leading to higher subsidy outgo
and unintended gains. This aberration in the Retention Price-cum-Subsidy
Scheme which is commonly referred to as gold plating has been critically
commenced upon in successive reports of the Standing Committee of
the Parliament. The Government was about to recover excess subsidies
and also to initiate penal action if so required after due examination.
This problem had remained unresolved for over eight years. It was
first mentioned in the report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee
on Fertilizer Prices submitted in 1992. Thereafter, Government had
set up two Expert Committees in succession to recommend the course
of action with regards to reassessment of capacities of urea manufacturing
units which were receiving undue benefit under the RPS by understatement
of capacities. The report of the latest Expert Committee headed
by Dr. Purohit, could not give a unanimous recommendation even after
detailed examination and analysis of unit-to-unit production data
for past over five years. To find a final solution to this, the
Government has now set up a Committee headed by Dr. Y.K. Alagh,
who is an eminent Economist and has held senior positions in the
Government. The Committee headed by Dr.Y.K. Alagh will has Dr. Arvind
Virmani, Additional Chief Economic Advisor in the Department of
Expenditure, as the other Member. Committee is going into the entire
issue of reassessment of capacity and quantifying the amount of
recoveries that shall be effected without seriously impinging on
the health of urea industry. This Committee is expected to submit
its report soon.
As a concurrent action, the matter has been referred to Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for assessing the evidence available
on record with regard to understatement of capacity and drawal of
excess subsidy to see whether penal action can be initiated against
the defaulting units as per provisions of Indian Penal Code. Notwithstanding
this as an interim measure, Department of Fertilizers has accepted
reassessment of capacity of urea producing units under method IV
of expert committee and given effect to it from 1.4.2000. The interim
reassessment of capacity has resulted in correction of the installed
capacity from 186 Lakhs MTs to 207 :akhs MTs with corresponding
subsidy savings of over Rs,500 Crore of this Rs,367 crore will accrue
only from the recent gas based units alone which have been a cause
of high capacity action is directed against units which had reportedly
understated their production capacities.
Task Force on WTO
The fertilizer industry has to gear up to the change which will
follow the removal of quantitative restrictions on urea from 01.04.2001.
The indigenous urea industry has thus for been protected from the
threat as these (imports) canalised and made on account of the Governments.
This situation may undergo a change after 1.4.2001 when the indigenous
manufacturers of urea will exposed to the competition from urea
manufacturers in the Middle East, CIS countries and other manufacturers.
The Task Force will evaluate the provisions of the agreement on
agriculture and other WTO agreements which may impact on the fertilizer
sector in the context of removal of quantitative restrictions. The
Task Force will study and recommend the options available for maintaining
the minimum required level of self-sufficiency of fertilizers in
the interest of food security of the country. It will also give
its suggestions regarding the bound tariff rates on urea and revision
in the bound rate of DAP taking into account the need to protect
the domestic industry without compromising with its efficiency and
competitive character.
Task Force on Coal
The availability and price of feedstocks have a determining role
in the growth and development of fertilizer industry. Naphtha was
the major feedstock for fertilizer units set up in seventies for
production of nitrogenous fertilizers. After that, natural gas emerged
as the preferred feedstock in eighties and nineties with the new
finds in Bombay High. About 65% of the installed capacity of nitrogenous
fertilizers today is based on natural gas. However, a re-look is
necessary because of the dwindling supply and share increase in
the prices of naphtha following the dismantling of administered
price mechanism for fuel and natural gas. the through use of coal
bed methane and gas hydried which have long term potentials in this
regard are at preliminary stage. Against this coal reserves in the
country are estimated to be 206.239 billion tonnes. These can last
for more than 100 years at the estimated annual demand of about
412.20 million tonnes. Cost of energy using coal as feedstock is
lowest at Rs.188 per G.Cal. (as against Rs.704, Rs.595 and Rs.373
per G.Cal. for naphtha, fuel oil and natural gas respectively).
This is, however, to be counterbalanced by the high investment of
Rs.2250 crore in case a coal based plant of standard size vis-a-vis
Rs.1500 crore in case of plant based LNG and Rs.1650 crore in case
of naphtha. Proven technology for use of coal as feedstock in fertilizer
sector is available and has been successfully tested in China and
Japan. Both the Joint Parliamentary Committee and the High Powered
Committee on Fertilizer Pricing have recommended exploration of
coal based technology in view of its overall advantages.
It is in this context that a high level Task Force headed by Secretary,
Department of fertilzers has been setup on 7th March, 2000. The
Task Force has nominations from Ministry of Science & Technology,
Ministry of Coal, Ministry of Power, Fertilizer Association of India
(FAI), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and
Projects & Development India Ltd. (PDIL) The Task Force shall
explore the possibility of using coal and coal bed methane in the
fertilizer sector and to suggest a policy outline for the development
of further capacities on Coal. It will also outline the incentives
required for development of R&D in the field of coal based technology.
The Task Force has initiated its deliberations and will soon submit
its report.
To focus attention of the Industry on this important aspect, a
national seminar on utilisation of coal for fertilizer sector has
been organised by the Department of Fertilizers on July 7, 2000
at Nagpur.
Turnaround of sick PSUs in the fertilizer sector
Department of Fertilizer (DOF) has taken initiatives in regard
to the sick fertilizer companies. Government of India has been spending
annually approx. Rs.300 crore by way of non-plan assistance for
salaries and wages and preservation charges for the sick companies
of HFC, FCI and PPCL of which most of the operating units, barring
Namrup (HFC) and Sindri (FCI), have been closed. The accumulated
losses of HFC are at a staggering Rs.4209 crore and FCI are Rs.5862
crore as on (31.3.2000). Both these companies have much larger problem
of idle manpower. HFC has a workforce of over 7600 while FCI has
over 6000.
Having regard to this, the department has taken a decision at the
initiative of Minister (C&F) to prepare a status paper on sickness
in the fertilizer sector. The status paper will focus on the sick
fertiliser companies in public sector namely of FCI, HFC, PPCL and
PDIL. A renowned Consultant namely, Credit Analysis and Research
Ltd. (CARE), has been engaged to assist the Department in preparing
a paper. The status paper will overview of the fertilizer industry,
industrial sickness in the country, sickness in the fertilizer sector,
preservation/closure of fertilizer units, reasons for sickness/closure,
unit specific case status, etc. It will also refer to previous studies,
figures of plan and non-plan support extended to the sick companies
by the Government and will have a chapter on feasibility of turnaround
of sick units. The status paper will also spell out the action to
be taken for rationalisation of manpower and cover the strategies
for the future which will look into the feedstock options like LNG
and Coal with focus on Eastern Region which account for most of
the sick companies in the fertilizer sector.
Transparency in the working of Department of Fertilizers
As a measure of increased transparency, the Department has initiated
number of actions which include putting the relevant information
on the web site. Fertilizer home page has been created in English
as well as in Hindi and has been placed at web site address as http//fert.nic.in
to enable access for internet users. The web site covers the list
of subjects allocated to the DOF, organisational set up, fertilizer
companies under the administrative control of the DOF. It includes
fertilizer company profiles and incorporates the E-mail Addresses/Web
Site Links to these companies. The features of the existing policy
are also included in the Web Site. The Site covers Procedure for
Import of Urea, Guidelines for Export of Single Super Phosphate,
Annual Report of the Department, Statistical Data pertaining to
Prices, Fertilizer Production, Movement, Consumption and Imports.
The site also gives the useful links related to the fertilizer sector
including the Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha Secretariat for Parliament Questions.
Joint Ventures Abroad
Due to constraints in the availability of gas, which is the preferred
feedstock for the production of nitrogenous fertilizers, and the
near total dependence of the country on imported raw materials for
production of phosphatic fertilizers, the Government has been encouraging
Indian companies to establish joint venture facilities in other
countries, which have rich reserves of natural gas, rock phosphate
and potash.
Following this approach, Government have approved investment of
US $ 80 million each by KRIBHCO and IFFCO for setting up a joint
venture nitrogenous fertilizer plant in Oman on 20.6.2000. This
project has been conceived on account of the following socio-economic
benefits to our country:
 |
Availability of gas at cheaper price than that of domestic
price
|
 |
Reduce the subsidy burden
|
 |
Ensure availability of urea to the extent of 16.52 LMT per
annum under a direct Urea Offtake Agreement for a period of
15 years at long-term prices
|
 |
Strengthen mutual relations with Oman both in political and
geo-strategic terms
|
 |
Further, with a view to finalise the long-term policy for
setting up joint ventures abroad, Government have recently
constituted a Task force under the Chairmanship of Secretary
(Fertilizers) consisting representatives of Ministry of External
Affairs, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Ministry
of Commerce, Fertilizer Association of India and Fertilizer
Industry. The Task Force has been asked to submit its report
within a period of six months
|
Initiative taken on Research and Development
After a review of the ongoing efforts on research and development
in the Fertilizer Industry, it was felt that focussed attention
was required to identify possible areas of research, operationalise
research in identified areas and explore options of financing research
projects. It was also felt that a close monitoring of ongoing research
was necessary. After discussion with representative of various of
organisations such as CSIR, IIT, Department of Science and Technology,
etc., it was felt that effective research could be carried out in
both basic science and applied areas. Further, need for research
in allied areas such as fertilizer use efficiency, crop response
ratio, farmers' extension programmes, etc. was recognised.
At the initiative of Minister of Chemicals & Fertilizers (C&F),
a high level Committee to be headed by Secretary Department of Fertilizers
with representative from CSIR, ICAR, Department of Science and Technology,
Fertilizer Companies and Research Organisations is proposed to be
set up to examine the hole range of issues in R&D. It is already
decided that research and development would be made one of the areas
for performance evaluation of Public Sector Enterprise. All PSUs/Cooperatives
would be asked to separate budget for R&D activities and appoint
Board Level Committees for monitoring performance in this area.
A mechanism is being worked out in association with IIT Delhi to
enable effective sharing of information between fertilizer companies
and Research Organisations both on the latest development in the
field of R&D and on the specific requirements of industry.
New Fertilizer Projects
Investment appraisal of the following mega fertilizer projects
was undertaken:
 |
Hazira Expansion Project of KRIBHCO
|
 |
Thal Expansion Project of RCF
|
 |
A new ammonia urea plant at Gorakhpur to be set up by KRIBHCO
at the site of FCIs old plants.
|
 |
Grass roots ammonia urea project to be set up at Nellore
by IFFCO.
|
After the investment appraisal, the Department played an active
role in resolving the difference in perception among various agencies,
on the number of projects required, keeping in view the likely demand
supply gap from the year 2003 onwards. The final proposal for approval
of investment has been processed after the necessary inter-ministerial
consultations and has been placed for consideration of the Cabinet
Committee on Economic Affairs. The proposal would go a long way
in attaining self-sufficiency in urea production at the same time
leaving sufficient room to take full benefit of the prevailing low
international urea prices.
Promotion of alternative fertilizer
There is a growing realisation that the use of chemical fertilizers
needs to be supplemented by alternate form of fertilizers such as
bio fertilizers and organic fertilizers. Promotion of alternate
fertilizers has been considered a thrust area in view of its distinct
advantages, such as low cost environmental protection etc. The Minister
of Fertilizers has formed the Committee with representatives from
Department of Agriculture, FAI, ICAR, Ministry of Urban Affairs,
some fertilizer companies and user organisations. The Committee
will look into the following issues:-
 |
Need of specific thrust of bio fertilizers for specific crops
and specific areas.
|
 |
Need of greater interaction with the agriculture universities.
|
 |
Identify and implement mechanism of quality control.
|
 |
Promote research and development efforts to increase shelf
life of bio fertilizers.
|
 |
Provide adequate testing laboratories at major user centres.
|
 |
Promote awareness by educating farmers on the benefits of
such fertilizers.
|
 |
Explore the mechanism for using bio mass including urban
waste to make organic fertilizer.
|
 |
Need to bring together buyers and sellers to develop organic
fertilizers.
|
It is also carrying out the detailed study on bio fertilizers
and bio mass including assessment of ground realities to get an
accurate picture of demand in each State.
11. Policy regarding new grassroot urea projects:
A policy decision has been taken regarding creation of new capacities
of urea in the fertilizer sector. Fertilizer industry is delicensed
and as on date promoters are free to set up fertilizer plants once
they get clearance for feedstock allocation. The High Powered Review
Committee on Fertilizer pricing Policy (HPC) had recommended that
new urea units might be justified only on strategic consideration
of desirable minimum level of self-sufficiency as India has no comparative
cost advantage in urea production. Urea is under Retention Pricing
Scheme and any new unit means a heavy outgo by way of subsidy. The
issue has become more urgent in the context of highly reduced gap
between demand and supply. Country is now more or less self-sufficient
in the field of urea production and for the past two years, urea
imports have been reduced to the minimum accounting for only about
2% of the total consumption. Imported urea is available at much
cheaper rates than subsidised urea being produced in the country.
The Deptt. of Fertilizers has, therefore, decided the following:-
 |
No new grassroot project for production of urea to be set
up in the public, private and cooperative sector for the next
three years except those public/cooperative sector projects
already proposed for consideration by the CCEA, till the 2003-04.
|
 |
In view of the gestation period of three years of commissioning
a urea plant, Deptt. of Fertilizers will review the position
with regard to the creation of new capacities only in April
2001.
|
 |
New units will get no guarantee about continuance of existing
Retention Price Scheme on a long term basis but may be given
subsidy support on the basis of Long Range Marginal Cost worked
out on the basis of LNG/gas as feedstock. They will get the
benefit of the retention pricing scheme only as long as it
lasts.
|
Joint ventures abroad for mining of potash
While India has become almost self-sufficient in production of
urea and has achieved a comfortable level of self-sufficiency in
phosphatic fertilizers, it is totally dependent on imports as far
as potassic fertilizers are concerned. It was, therefore, decided
by the DOF that India should set up joint ventures abroad in countries
having abundant reserves of potash to enable the country to have
assured sources of supply of potassic fertilizers. In pursuance
of this, IFFCO and Indian Potash Ltd.(IPL) are exploring a joint
venture in Argentina with an Argentinian joint venture partner.
Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd.(KRIBHCO) has also initiated action
to explore the possibilities of mining the potassic reserves in
Lao PDR. These joint ventures are at very initial stages but are
being pursued vigorously and will mark a new chapter in India's
self-sufficiency with regard to availability of fertilizers.
Policy Initiatives with regard to exports and imports of urea
Another initiative taken pertains to promoting indigenously produced
urea for use in manufacture of complex fertilizers in substitution
of imported urea. The manufacturers of complex fertilizers in the
country used to import about 6 lakh tonnes of urea per annum in
view of the low prices of imported urea for converting into complex
fertilizers in their plants. As a measure of the new initiative,
these complex fertilizers manufacturers have been directed to use
the indigenously produced urea available in the country in excess
of that required for internal consumption by procuring it from indigenous
producers at import parity prices. This measure will allow extra
production to indigenous urea producing units while at the same
time will curb the outgo of foreign exchange by substituting the
imported urea.
Indigenous urea manufacturers have also been asked to explore possibilities
of exporting urea especially to neighbouring countries subject to
clearance on case-to-case basis by the Department of Fertilizers.
Handling Emergencies
There was no effect on the movement and availability of fertilizers
following the transporters strike in October, 1999. All States received
sufficient availability of major fertilizers Urea, Di-Ammonium
Phosphate (DAP) and Muriate of Potash (MOP). This was due to the
movement of sizeable quantity during the first three weeks of November.
At the behest of Minister, a control room was setup in Delhi which
maintained close liaison with the State Governments and monitored
the situation.
KANDLA EXPANSION PROJECT LAUNCHED
The Second Phase of the Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative
Ltd.(IFFCO) Kandla Expansion Plant was dedicated to the nation by
the union Home Minister, Shri L.K. Advani. The Minister of Chemicals
and Fertilizers presided over the function. Complimenting IFFCO
for becoming the worlds largest cooperative fertilizer manufacturer.
Shri Prabhu called on the cooperative sector to prepare its "VISION
2050" and set up R&D facilities to incorporate latest technologies
and produce agro-chemicals and fertilizers based on research.
Simplification in techno-economic clearance for project imports
for fertilizer sector.
Existing departmental guidelines for granting techno-economic clearance
(TEC) to the renovation/modernisation schemes and attestation of
list of imported goods for (substantial expansion/setting up of
new) fertilizer projects for availing custom duty benefit have been
modified with a view to simplify the procedure and to facilitate
early attestation and tech-economic clearance and to provide greater
transparency. This is intended to be a major step towards rationalisation
of policy of capital investment in the fertilizer sector. The existing
system of one stage clearance has been substituted by as system
of two stage clearance. At the first stage only the essentiality
of the proposal would be scrutinised on the basis of the estimated
costs of the project imports. Companies, however, will thereafter
be expected to procure the goods on the basis of competitive bidding
to ensure reasonability of prices. Proprietary goods will be exempted
from competitive bidding process. Policy has been further liberalised
for composite units manufacturing both chemicals and fertilizers.
Concessional customs duties are admissible only for project imports
of fertilizer plants. This created problems in relation to composite
units. It has, therefore, been decided in the new policy that in
the case of composite units which manufacture both chemicals and
fertilizers, concessional customs duty should be available on proportionate
basis on the quantum of ammonia or any other intermediate product
which is used for production of fertilizers subject to one condition
only that the percentage of production for fertilizer use should
not be below 50%.
Diversification
Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Ltd., (IFFCO) a giant in
the fertilizer sector and the leading producers of fertilizers in
India, has taken a major initiative to branch out in the field of
insurance. It has in principle taken, decision to enter into a joint
venture with Tokio Marine of Japan. IFFCO will retain
major shareholding in the proposed joint venture and the Japanese
collaborator will be offered 26% stake in the equity. It is expected
that an agreement to this effect between IFFCO and Tokio Marine
will be arrived at shortly. The scope of the insurance project includes
rural, crop, fire, marine insurance business. It is proposed to
give a special package for fertilizers industry covering industrial
risk policies and urea distribution risk. The Ministry gave all
support to IFFCO in going ahead with this venture.
Policy for capital additions regarding sick units under BIFR.
Another new policy decision has been taken to facilitate early
and quick recognition of capital additions applicable to the sick
and BIFR units. As per the existing policy, only the capital expenditure
incurred by units upto the costed year (i.e. a year proceeding the
last year before the commencement of the new pricing policy) is
considered. This policy holds up refund of expenditure already incurred
by the sick units on capital additions and leads to delay in reimbursement
of the money spent on capital additions which is very difficult
for the sick units. Considering the fact that sick and BIFR units
are already facing serious liquidity problems and cannot execute
the modernisation/revamping scheme without circulation of limited
funds, a policy decision has been taken which will improve the cash
flows. It is now proposed to recognise in case of sick and BIFR
units past capital additions (net of delitions) made under modernisation/revamping
schemes without circulation of limited funds , a policy decision
has been taken which will improve the cash flows. It is now propose
to recognise on an early basis past capital additions (net of delitions)
made under modernisation/revamp schemes from 1990-91 onwards in
case of sick and BIFR Units. Even the future capital additions by
sick and BIFR units from 1.4.99 onwards till completion of the revamping
project may also be considered on yearly basis subject to prior
approval and detailed examination of the project and regular monitoring
of FICC.
FICC
The Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers took a review of the
functioning of the FICC and the following decisions were taken.
 |
A vision statement to be prepared for FICC.
|
 |
Introduction of Cost Audit System in FICC.
|
 |
Preparation of a computerised transportation model on the
transportation of fertilizers by the Movement Division.
|
|